ind02 | González-Albo (1941) has validly described the Staticetum caespitosae, the automatic holotypus of the alliance Jasionion carpetanae. The latter alliance was syntaxonomically identified (by placement into synonymy) as the Minuartio bigerrensis-Festucion curvifoliae Rivas-Mart. 1964 corr. Rivas-Mart. et al. 2011. The only reason for placement of the Jasionion carpetanae into the synonymy was the assumption that the Jasionion carpetanae should be considered a nomen ambiguum (ICPN art. 37), a case still lacking convincing proof. Interestingly, the Staticetum caespitosae has not been listed as one of the associations of the Minuartio-Festucion curvifolae by Rivas-Martínez et al. (2011: 268−169) despite otherwise very comprehensive accounts of associations in all alliances handled in the latter paper. Due to lack of proper arguments proving the name Jasionion carpetanae illegitimate, technically the latter name remains the valid and current name for this syntaxonomic concept until proven otherwise. (L. Mucina).
Synonyms
Minuartio bigerrensis-Festucion curvifoliae Rivas-Mart. 1964 corr. Rivas-Mart. et al. 2011
(syntax.syn.)
– ind04 The proposal of the new correction of the name 'Minuartio juresii-Festucion curvifoliae Rivas-Mart. 1964 corr. Rivas-Mart., Fernández-González et Loidi 1999' has been published by Rivas-Martínez et al. (2011: 475); see also Remark ind02. (L. Mucina).
Minuartio juresii-Festucion aragonensis Rivas-Mart. 1964 corr. Rivas-Mart. et al. 1990
Minuartio juresii-Festucion curvifoliae Rivas-Mart. 1964 corr. Rivas-Mart. et al. 1999
– ind03 Rivas-Martínez et al. (1999) published the formal proposal serving this name change. It appears to be superfluous because of yet another correction (regarding the identity of Minuartia) had to be undertaken; see also Remark ind02. (L. Mucina).
Minuartio juresii-Festucion indigestae Rivas-Mart. In Rivas Goday et Rivas-Mart. 1963
(2b)