Rumici acetosellae-Scleranthion perennis de Foucault 1999
(phantom)
Rumici acetosellae-Scleranthion perennis de Foucault 2001
(3b)
Sedo-Scleranthion Br.-Bl. 1949
(2b)
Sedo-Scleranthion Br.-Bl. 1950
(31)
– sed02 The name 'Sedo-Scleranthion all. nova' was validly published in Braun-Blanquet (1949b). The original diagnosis of the alliance includes two associations, namely the 'Sclerantheto-Sempervivetum arachnoidei Br.-Bl. nom. nova' and the 'Sedetum montanis ass. nova'. The latter is a nomen nudum as there are neither relevés published nor any bibliographical reference made to any published relevés. As far as the ‘Sclerantheto-Sempervivetum’ is concerned, there is a bibliographical reference to published relevés on pp. 268−273 in Chodat & Anand (1936) of the associations 'Sempervivetum arachnoidei' and 'Festucetum ovinae' with Scleranthus annuus and Sempervivum arachnoideum. Therefore, the name 'Sclerantheto-Sempervivetum arachnoidei' (although it is a nomen superfluum) and the Sedo-Scleranthion were validly published. However, the pertinent publication date is not 1949 but 1950 because the bibliographical references had been published only in the sixth part of the paper in Braun-Blanquet (1950; ICPN art. 6) and the correct citations should then read: the 'Sclerantho-Sempervivetum arachnoidei (Chodat et Anand 1936) Braun-Blanquet 1936 nom. superfl.' (ICPN art. 29) and the 'Sedo-Scleranthion Braun-Blanquet 1950', respectively. (J.-P. Theurillat) The publication of the same name by Braun-Blanquet (1955) was superfluous and the name should be considered as illegitimate according to the ICPN art. 31. (L. Mucina).
Sedo-Scleranthion Br.-Bl. 1955
(31)
Sempervivo-Sedion (Br.-Bl. 1955) T. Müller 1961
(29)
This web page uses for the attendance analysis cookies. By using this web you agree with this.
More info.